
My Jewish New TestamentApril 30th, 2010 I have been reading a book that purports to reveal to it’s reader a deeper understanding of Messiah through understanding the cultural context of the events in his life. I grew up with the motto: if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything; so I won’t mention the book or its author by name. But I must say that I am finding this book hard to read. So much of the author’s time is spent trying to create context where none in the Scriptural text exists. Although some of what he says may be true, most of what he claims as 1st Century Jewish cultural practise is unattested and, to my mind, dubious. I ask myself the question: why? Why does he feel this need to create (however well-intentioned) a context beyond what is already clearly there? When I first encountered the New Testament writings, the B’rit Hadashah, it didn’t take me very long to recognize how Jewish they were. I don’t necessarily mean in linguistic style with respect to the Hebrew Scriptures; after all there were approximately 400 years between the last writer of the Hebrew Scriptures (Malachi) and the earliest of the New Covenant writings. That’s about the same time lapse between modern language and the language of Shakespeare, so we can anticipate a real difference in style. The Jewishness of the New Testament I found in the Jewish understanding of its writers – both in what was written and what is assumed and therefore not written. A good example is the encounter between John the Baptizer and those sent to question him in the Gospel of John 1:19-27. Here we have a very Jewish discussion about a very Jewish matter. We see a delegation from the Sanhedrin being sent to John to ask what he was doing. In this conversation, no one asks what the other is talking about, because it is understood by the parties involved – they are asking about issues regarding the coming of the Messiah. Furthermore, John the Gospel writer does not feel the need to explain these things to his reader – he assumes they understand. All the writers of the B’rit Hadashah were Jewish, (even the supposed Gentile, Luke, I believe,) and wrote with a Jewish understanding. As a Jew, that was very clear to me as I first read the book. Not Jewish in the way of the rabbinic writings, but Jewish in the way of the 1st Century writers of the time. If you are Jewish and have not read the B’rit Hadashah (New Testament), why not check it out and read from Jewish writers about your Jewish Messiah, Yeshua. Contributed by Daniel Muller, General Director of New Covenant Forum. Posted in Jesus and Jews, Jews and Jesus, This, That, The Other Thing, Uncategorized | No Comments » “Avatar” EnvyApril 28th, 2010 Some time after the movie “Avatar” came out, I read a e-news article alleging that a number of people who saw the movie were experiencing depression because of it (see here). The article I read stated that people saw the peaceful and exotic planet of the Na’vi natives who lived symbiotically with their world, and longed for the same. Not seeing that possibility in the real world, they became depressed. I have finally had the opportunity to see the movie (an excellent one in my opinion). Indeed the world portrayed in the movie is one where people are at peace with their surroundings and seem to know their place in the scheme of things. There is a beneficially symbiotic relationship between the planet and its people who, though broken up in clans, seem to have good relationships with each other. Everything would be perfect if it were not for the horrible humans coming in and ruining it all for their own monetary gain. Looking at this Edenic world, I am not at all surprised that some people get depressed. I wonder if deep down inside each and every one of us, there is not a memory of Gan Eden (the Garden of Eden), and with it a longing to return. After all, in Gan Eden, there existed a peaceful relationship between ourselves and our Maker, represented in the movie by the spirit of the planet. In Gan Eden, humankind knew their place in the world and were at peace, one with another. In Gan Eden, the world was beautiful and undisturbed and we had a good relationship with flora and fauna alike. Life, in fact was perfect. For a picture of this perfect world, read Genesis 1 and 2. That peace existed because humankind was at peace with its creator. But all that ended with the first sin. That brought disunity between us and God. Just as a wall that is not plumb eventually falls apart, our world has slowly been unravelling so that sin, and sickness abounds and we no longer feel attuned to the world around us. No wonder some get depressed when they make this comparison. I was not one of them, however. Because even as Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden and created that separation between humankind and God, God was there caring for his fallen creatures. And God has made a promise that one day all that was wrong would be made right. He said to Abraham that, “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” That blessings was Messiah Yeshua (Jesus Christ). One of his 1st Century disciples said this: “For if many died through one man’s trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many. (Romans 5:15)” Yeshua has brought peace between God and those who accept the free gift of His grace: Christ sacrificed on the cross for our sin. When we are in Christ, though we are still buffeted by the ill winds of this earth, we yet have peace with God and the promise of a new Eden. “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says … to the one who conquers I will grant to eat of the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God. (Revelation 2:7)” This is the promise of those who believe in Messiah – that they will once again dwell in peace and in harmony with their world and with their Creator. As we who believe already have that promise – what possible reason is there to be depressed? Don’t be depressed – be at one with God, through your Saviour Yeshua! Contributed by Daniel Muller, General Director of New Covenant Forum. Posted in Blog, This, That, The Other Thing, Uncategorized | No Comments » Persecution of righteous Israel?April 19th, 2010
Dr. Brown brings up an excellent point. The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob promised blessing to the righteous. In Deuteronomy Chapter 28, an intrinsic part of His covenant commitment with Israel, the Lord says that he will bless Israel when they are righteous and curse Israel when they are unrighteous. This is a common theme that is aptly taken up by the prophets as they continually warned Israel of their behaviour towards God and the consequences of their disobedience. Indeed, one of the problems with the identification of the suffering servant of Isaiah 53 as the Nation of Israel (an interpretation first popularized in the 11th Century by Rabbi Shlomo ben Yitzhak, known as Rashi) is that the suffering servant is clearly defined as a righteous servant. If this servant represents the nation of Israel, then God has broken his promise. It is far better to interpret this passage as speaking of the Messiah, as even the Talmudic sages did when referring to it. So if the Jewish religion of the rabbis is correct, why was Jerusalem and the Temple destroyed in 70 AD? Why have our Jewish people been under continual dispersion for the last 2,500 years? Why, in fact, have we been the subject of the curses of Exodus 28 rather than the blessings? Is it not possible evidence that the Jewish religion of the rabbis is not the biblical Jewish religion – not the Jewish religion according to God? Is it not also possible that the state of Israel exists today, at a time when there are more Jewish people coming to faith in Messiah Yeshua (Jesus) than since the time of Yeshua itself, in preparation for the fulfillment of the prophet Zechariah’s prophecy? “And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and pleas for mercy, so that, when they look on me, on him whom they have pierced, they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for an only child, and weep bitterly over him, as one weeps over a firstborn. (Zechariah 12:10)” Really, what makes more sense? Think about it! Contributed by Daniel Muller, General Director of New Covenant Forum. Posted in Jesus and Jews, Jewish Tradition, Jews and Jesus, Talmud vs. Tanakh, Uncategorized | No Comments » Nothing but the blood of Yeshua!April 13th, 2010 There is a song of Christian praise that goes, The song’s message is very clear: if we want to make atonement for our transgressions against God – for our sins – then we must do it through the atoning blood of Jesus the Messiah. This is not a strange concept. It is a concept that comes right out of the pages of the Tanakh. In Vayeekra (Leviticus) we see God instructing Moses about the sacrificial system for the temple. The first 10 of the books 27 chapters is taken up with these instructions and their institution among the Israelites. Later, in Chapter 17, God talk about the importance of people bringing their sacrifice to the temple and insisting that they do not eat the blood of it. Then he explains why the eating of blood is prohibited: “For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes atonement for one’s life. (Leviticus 17:11)” God is very explicit here – the means of atonement is through the covering of the blood. The Hebrew word for atonement comes from the Hebrew word for “cover”. It is from this same root that we have the term Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement), Kippah (the skullcap that is worn by Jewish men) and Koporeth (the ‘mercy seat’ which covered the Ark of the Covenant). God tells us in Leviticus that it is the blood of the sacrifice that makes atonement. The question is, how? We need to go back to earlier chapters (Leviticus 4:27-31) to see how the guilt offering was to be presented: Let us look at this sacrifice step by step: This was how atonement was to be made according to the Word of God given to the Israelites on Mount Sinai. Nowhere does he make atonement available in any other way but by the substitutionary sacrifice at the temple and the pouring our of blood as a covering for sin. In Jeremiah 31:31-34 we read these words: So God was to bring a covenant that was not going to be like the covenant at Mount Sinai. It will be a new covenant. Yeshua, on the night before he went to the cross, while celebrating the Passover Seder, took matzah after the dinner (the afikomen?) and proclaimed that it represented his body that was broken for his disciples (Luke 22:19). He also took the cup of redemption after dinner and referring to the Jeremiah passage above said of it, “this cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.” Yeshua pointed to himself as the fulfillment of the covenant promised by God through Jeremiah. And he was broken on the cross and his blood became the ‘kapor’ for our sins. It is now through Messiah Yeshua that we can have atonement. How? The same way the Israelite did in the covenant with Moses. 1. A person first has to recognize his guilt. God has given no other provision by which salvation can be had, but by the blood of Yeshua. No other way is biblically authorized. The reason the temple was destroyed in 70 C.E. is that the temple was no longer needed. The New Covenant brought the final and lasting sacrifice that brings atonement from sin and brings eternal life with God. As God is unchanging, so his principles are unchangeing, including the princple of substitutionary sacrifice and the covering of blood to make atonement. Only the vehicle is different. Instead of the yearly sacrifice of bulls and rams, we have the once and for all sacrifice of Messiah. Will you accept the Messiah today? It is a matter of life and death. If you do, please contact us and let us know about it. Contributed by Daniel Muller, General Director of New Covenant Forum. Posted in Atonement, Blog, Jews and Jesus, Messiah in the Tanach, Uncategorized | No Comments » How can God have a son?April 8th, 2010 How can God have a son? I mostly get this objection about Yeshua HaMashiach (Jesus Christ) from Muslims, but not a few Jews have asked me the same thing. The idea of Jesus being the Son of God seems distasteful, and that is because the title is misunderstood. The first point to make is that the term Son of God is indeed a title. God himself has many names in the Tanakh (the Hebrew Scriptures): El (אל), Elohim (אלהים), El-Shaddai (אל שדי), Adonai (אדני), and finally the Tetragrammaton – the four letters that represent the name by which God proclaimed himself to Moses (יהוה). Then there are the many titles of God: Adonai Tzva’ot (Lord of Hosts), Adonai Yireh (God who provides), Adonai Nissi (God my shield), along with many, many others that are used in the Tanakh. The Messiah too, has many titles in the Tanakh. Job calls him his Redeemer (Job 19:25). He is Immanuel (Isaiah 7:14, literally ‘God with us’). He is the Branch (Isaiah 11:1, Jeremiah 23:5; 33:15; Zechariah 3:8; 6:12). His most famous title is found in Isaiah 9:6 in which he is called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6). A few hundred years before Jesus ministered on earth, the prophet Malachi called him the “messenger of the covenant (Malachi 3:1).” Even if you don’t believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the point is that these are recognized as messianic titles even in rabbinic literature. Now it is true that the title, Son of God is not mentioned in the Tanakh, though we see a hint of it in Psalm 2. Yet the fact that the phrase “Son of God” in reference to Messiah is not mentioned in Tanakh does not mean that the title isn’t correct, for it is clear that God reveals both his names and the names of Messiah over a period of time. God did not present himself as יהוה (YHWH) until he gave the Law on Mount Sinai. So we read these verses in Exodus 6:3, “I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as God Almighty, [el-shaddai] but by my name the LORD I did not make myself known to them.” Similarly, we are not told of the title of Prince of Peace until the time of Jeremiah the prophet in the 6th Century B.C.E. (Isaiah 9:6). Furthermore, the concept of Messiah as the Son of God was already found in the Jewish writings known as the Apocrypha and the Deuterocanonical books (e.g. (Enoch 55:2; 2 Esdras 7:28-29; 13:32). These were written in the centuries before and after Jesus, and indicate a Jewish understanding of Messiah’s ‘Sonship’. Finally, the title Son of God is fully revealed and confirmed to us at the time Messiah Yeshua came to minister on earth. Son of God reminds us both of Messiah’s (Christ’s) divinity and his humanity. He is not a son in the same sense that I have a son, as many Muslims would object. Nor, as many Jewish people would insist is he man claimed to be God. Yeshua is God come as Man, born of a virgin by the miraculous work of the Holy Spirit (as one Yiddish writer puts in the mouth of his young protagonist, “If God can do anything, why can’t he make a virgin pregnant?”) to be the reconciler of sinful humans to a holy and righteous God. Yeshua, in his humanity, had to deal with the same temptations of life as we, but he would not give in to those temptations. That is why, in a letter to the Jewish believers in Jerusalem, the author can write, “we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin. (Hebrews 4:15)” God come as man to be a sacrifice – a self-sacrifice – for our sins. As Isaiah 53:10 foretold, he became an asham (a guilt offering) and so made atonement for those who believe and accept the sacrifice God made on their behalf. Won’t you honestly consider the claims of this Jewish messiah for yourself? Won’t you consider the free gift of salvation that brings eternal life with God, by putting your faith in the Messiah promised and sent by God the Father: Yeshua, the Son of God? Contributed by Daniel Muller, General Director of New Covenant Forum. Posted in Atonement, Jesus and Jews, Jews and Jesus, Knowing God, Messiah in the Tanach | No Comments » Passover: remembering redemption and the alternativeApril 7th, 2010 Published in the Contact – Issue 2010-1 Passover is one of the most important holidays on the Jewish calendar. It is certainly one of the most celebrated. Even Jews who are not very religious in practice, will annually celebrate the Passover Seder, the special ceremonial meal that recounts God’s redemption of the Jewish people from servitude in Egypt. Throughout the Passover Seder, the miraculous deeds of God are recounted, praised and glorified. God sent Joseph into Egypt to prepare the way. Then, after the Israelites became enslaved, God protected Moses while other infants his age were killed. God later met Moses at the burning bush. God sent Moses to Pharaoh to proclaim freedom for his people. God brought down ten plagues on the Egyptians, culminating in Pharaoh’s release of the Israelites. God caused the Egyptians to be generous at Israel’s departure. God divided the sea so that Israel could pass beyond the reach of the Egyptian army who themselves were destroyed as God drowns them in the sea. All of these amazing things God did to redeem His people Israel from bondage and slavery to Pharaoh. All these things the Jewish people rejoice in, and rightly so. Beyond that there were the miracles in the wilderness, the giving of the Law on Mount Sinai, the sending of manna for eating, the defeat of the Amalekites (Exodus 17:8-16), the clothes and sandals that lasted 40 years (Deuteronomy 29:5), and, finally, the fall of Jericho and their entry into the Promised Land. For all these reasons, Passover is a time of great rejoicing. And yet there is a shadow on the proceedings. There are four cups that are drunk during the Passover Seder – a ceremony that might take four or five hours. In order these cups are: The Cup of Sanctification Of the four, the cup of redemption is the most important – reminding us of the blood of the Passover lamb that was sacrificed so that Israel could have redemption from Egyptian bondage as they put the blood of the lamb on their doorposts. This is the same cup that Yeshua used when he said, “this cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood. (Luke 22:20)” Yeshua points to himself as the new Passover Lamb that brings redemption – not from bondage and slavery to Pharaoh, but bondage and slavery to sin and death, as promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34. All four cups are drunk after reciting the appropriate prayers, and all of them remind us of the unalloyed joy of God’s salvation – all, except the second cup, the Cup of Plagues. Something different is done with this cup. In Jewish tradition, a full cup represents complete joy; and so all the cups at the Passover table are to be filled to the brim. Before drinking the Cup of Plagues, however, we place our finger in our cup and let 10 drops fall onto our plates as everyone at the table recites the 10 plagues that were poured out on the Egyptians: one drop per plague. In this way we diminish our joy. We mourn the loss of the Egyptians, whose destruction came for our benefit. Does it seem right to express sorrow for the enemies of God? We must remember that God’s wrath on the Egyptians doesn’t mean he didn’t love the Egyptians. Many centuries later, through the prophet Isaiah, God talks about a time when Egypt will be blessed (Isaiah 19:25). We also know that though Egypt didn’t follow God, neither did the Israelites throughout most of their history and God eventually punished them for their disobedience. The Scriptures describe the grief with which God punished Israel, and yet God always holds out the promise of redemption to them when they turn back to Him (2 Chronicles 7:14). In all this there is an application for believers hinted at by the Apostle Paul when he writes: We who are believers in Messiah Jesus, came to be believers while we were yet enemies of God. The Gentiles among us are like the Egyptians, just as the Jews among us are like the prodigal nation Israel. Yet God loved us and brought us out of bondage and into eternal life. As children of God, should we not therefore sorrow over those who remain enemies of God? Should we not mourn for those who are destined to live eternally without God’s presence? Should we not strive to reach out to those who are enemies, so that they might know Him as father and friend? There are great lessons, I think, in this second cup of the Passover Seder – the Cup of Plagues. Through this cup, sorrow for the lost is expressed even in the midst of the joy of the redeemed. Certainly we have joy in the redemption that was obtained through Christ’s sacrifice on the cross, however our joy cannot be complete while there are still those who are suffering. Furthermore we should cherish our salvation all the more as we remember the alternative – that from which we were delivered – the pain of death and separation from God for eternity – the sufferings of hell. Let us remember God’s admonition to Jonah, who wanted to see the Ninevites die instead of allowing God to redeem them: Let us cherish our salvation, and let us express God’s love for the lost by being the messenger of the Good News of Jesus Christ! Contributed by Daniel Muller, General Director of New Covenant Forum. Posted in Blog, Goyim for God, Jesus and Jews, Jewish festivals, Jewish holidays, Messiah in the Tanach, This, That, The Other Thing | No Comments » |
Canada's oldest on-going mission to the Jewish community. Proclaiming Jesus as Messiah and Saviour since 1894. Most Recent Blog Posts
Topics |